The Recycler
  • Biuromax Masthead web banner March 2024
  • Katun web banner December 2022 NEW
  • G&G Masthead August 2024

Lexmark to pay $12 million in Class Action

May 12, 2020

The initial complaint was filed in July 2017, and alleged that during the classified period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose material information, about its business and prospects.

On 21 July 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending 30 June 2015, and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. Lexmark revealed that its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases, which produced excessive inventory.

Following this news, Lexmark’s stock price dropped materially, which caused investors harm.

According to the complaint, throughout the above mentioned period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors.

On 21 July 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending 30 June 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Upon release of this news, shares of Lexmark fell in value materially, which caused investors harm according to the complaint.

Following several rounds of negotiations aided by the mediator, the Parties reached an agreement to settle the Litigation for $12 million (€11.09 million) in cash, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and expenses, award to the Lead Plaintiff, and administrative and other settlement costs, subject to the negotiation of the terms of a Stipulation and approval by the Court.

Categories : Around the Industry

Tags : Class Action Lexmark Settlement

  • Biuromax web banner July 2024
  • G&G Big & Bold Web banner January 2024
  • IR Italiana Web ad January 2021
  • GM Technology Web Banner August 2024
  • TN Group Sep 2024 Web banner
  • Apex September 2024 Web ad
  • Static Control June 2022 Big & Bold Ad
  • Ink Tank September 2024 Web ad
  • Cartridge Web September 2024 web ad
  • HYB Web banner Jan 2024
  • Mito Web banner June 2024
  • Zhono Web ad March 2024
  • denner UK Web Banner Jul 2024
  • PCL September 2024 Web Ad
  • CET Web ad December 2023
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • Denner Feb 2024 Web Ad
  • denner UK Web Banner Jul 2024
  • CET Web ad December 2023
  • Mito Web banner June 2024
  • HYB Web banner Jan 2024
  • Denner Feb 2024 Web Ad
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • PCL September 2024 Web Ad
  • Zhono Web ad March 2024
  • Mito Web banner June 2024
  • Denner Feb 2024 Web Ad
  • CET Web ad December 2023
  • Zhono Web ad March 2024
  • HYB Web banner Jan 2024
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • denner UK Web Banner Jul 2024
  • PCL September 2024 Web Ad

The Recycler, Wittas House, Two Rivers, Station Lane, Witney, OX28 4BH, United Kingdom | Tel: +44 (0) 1993 899800 | Fax : +44 (0) 1993 226899
©2006-2023 The Recycler - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy including cookie use

Web design Dorset | Websites by Mark

The Recycler Subscribe Web ad January 2021
The Recycler Subscribe Web ad January 2021